Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives

qr code

open access

eISSN 2233-6052  l  pISSN 2210-9099

Osong Public Health Res Perspect > 6(6); 2015 > Article

Moosazadeh, Afshari, Keianian, Nezammahalleh, and Enayati: Prevalence of Head Lice Infestation and Its Associated Factors among Primary School Students in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

ObjectivesHead lice infestation is one of the most important health problems, generally involving children aged 5–13 years. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of head lice infestation and its associated factors among primary school children using systematic review and meta-analysis methods.

MethodsDifferent national and international databases were searched for selecting the relevant studies using appropriate keywords, Medical Subject Heading terms, and references. Relevant studies with acceptable quality for meta-analysis were selected having excluded duplicate and irrelevant articles, quality assessment, and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. With calculating standard errors according to binomial distribution and also considering the Cochrane's Q test as well as I-squared index for heterogeneity, pediculosis prevalence rate was estimated using Stata SE V.11 software.

ResultsForty studies met the inclusion criteria of this review and entered into the meta-analysis including 200,306 individuals. Using a random effect model, the prevalence (95% confidence interval) of head lice infestation among primary school children was estimated as 1.6% (1.2–2.05), 8.8% (7.6–9.9), and 7.4% (6.6–8.2) for boys, girls, and all the students, respectively. The infestation rate was found to be associated with low educational level of parents, long hair, family size, mother's job (housewife), father's job (worker/unemployed), using a common comb, lack of bathrooms in the house, and a low frequency of bathing.

ConclusionThis meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of head lice infestation among Iranian primary school children is relatively high with more prevalence among girls. We also found that economic, social, cultural, behavioral, and hygienic factors are associated with this infestation.

Keywords:

Keywords

head lice; infestation; pediculosis; primary students; prevalence

IntroductionPublic health is a main factor of development in each community [1]. Despite the promotions in health and medical education, external parasitic infestation is a threat for community health development which is still considered as a public health concern [2]. Head lice are insects living as external parasites on humans and animals body. Human infestations occur as head lice (the most common type), body lice, and pubic lice [3].Head lice infestation is a main public health problem and a great threat for personal hygiene involving children aged between 5 years and 13 years [4]. The disease is widespread around the world but is more common in developing countries, among school age children, and in crowded places with low socio-economic and poor hygiene conditions 5, 6, 7. Indicators concerning the infestation of head lice are used to assess the health, cultural, and economic situation of rural and urban communities [8].Epidemic relapsing fever and epidemic typhus can be transmitted by lice. Because of frequent blood feeding and saliva injection, fatigue, psychological irritability, paranoia, and weakness can also occur. Other related complications are as follows: depression, hyperthermia, headache, feeling of heaviness in the body, muscle rigidity, attention deficit in the class and educational failure, insomnia, lack of social status, developing secondary infections, hair loss, and allergies 7, 8, 9.Different prevalences of head lice among primary school children in the world have been reported. According to the results of a study [10], head lice prevalence was estimated as 4.8% (The Netherlands), 35% (Brazil), 1.2% (Turkey), 28.8% (Venezuela), and 29.7% (Argentina). Such variations have been observed in different provinces of Iran such as 4% in Urmia [10], 13.5% in Hamedan [8], 1.8% in Kerman [11], and 4.7% in Sanandaj [12].The initial search results showed that different studies have been carried out to estimate the prevalence of head lice infestation among Iranian primary school children. There are remarkable variations in the results of these studies limiting their application for decision making and policy making. To provide reliable evidence, combining the findings of different studies using systematic review and meta-analytic methods is considered as an appropriate solution. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of pediculosis among Iranian primary school children using meta-analysis techniques.

Materials and methodsThe current study is a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of head lice (Pediculosis capitis) among primary school children in Iran.

2.1 Search strategyDifferent national (SID, Iranmedex, Magiran, and Irandoc) and international (PubMed, Google scholar, Scopus, and ScienceDirect) databases were investigated to provide articles published from January 1, 2000 until January 20, 2015. The search strategy was performed using keywords including: “epidemiology”, “prevalence”, “infestation”, “head louse”, “head lice”, “Pediculus humans capitis”, “pediculosis”, “primary school students”, “primary students”, “school children”, and “Iran”, as well as their Farsi equivalents.Searching was conducted from January 21, 2015 to February 10, 2015. To increase the search sensitivity and to investigate more evidence, references of published articles were hand searched. Two researchers independently reviewed the studies for a possible inclusion in the review using an eligibility form. In addition, to find the results of unpublished studies, we interviewed some related experts and research centers.

2.2 Study selectionFirst the titles, then the abstract, and finally the full text of the articles were consulted to retrieve the studies fit for the review. The relevant studies were selected independently by two researchers. It should be noted that in order to prevent reprint bias, the findings of all studies were carefully reviewed and any duplicated research was excluded.

2.3 Quality assessmentSelected articles were assessed for quality using a standard checklist applied in previous studies [13]. Based on the components used in the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology checklist [14], a checklist was designed and used in the current systematic review including 12 questions about different methodological aspects of a study such as sample size estimation and selection, type of study, study population, data collection method and instrument, variable definition, diagnostic method of pediculosis infestation, statistical tests, objectives of the study, appropriate illustration, and presentation of findings according to the objectives. Studies obtaining at least eight quality scores [13] were entered in the final meta-analysis.

2.4 Inclusion criteriaAll Persian and English written papers that passed the necessary assessment steps, received the required quality scores, and also estimated the infestation rate for all students or boys or girls, were entered in the meta-analysis.

2.5 Exclusion criteriaStudies without prevalence results for all students or according to both sex, those without definite sample size, abstracts presented in congresses without full text, and case–control studies and clinical trials that could not report a correct estimate of prevalence were excluded from the meta-analysis step.

2.6 Data extractionAll necessary information such as title, first author name, date of the study conduction, sample size (total, boys and girls), type of the study, sampling method, study area, language, prevalence of infestation according to gender, p value for the association between infestation and potential risk factors (educational levels and parents' profession, hair length, shared use of personal cosmetics, family size, easy access to bathroom or having bathroom in the house, and number of bathing occasions per week) were extracted from each study and entered into an excel spreadsheet. Meanwhile, two researchers independently extracted the data.

2.7 Statistical AnalysisAll collected data were entered into STATA version 11 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). Standard error of the prevalence in each study was calculated according to binomial distribution. Cochrane test (Q) and I2 indices were applied to determine the heterogeneity of the study results. Due to the significant heterogeneity, a random effect model was used to estimate the total and gender specific prevalence's of pediculosis. In addition, to minimize the random variations between the point estimates, results of the studies were adjusted using Bayesian analysis methods. Finally, we assessed the potential effects of different variables on the mentioned heterogeneity using met regression methods. Having conducted a sensitivity analysis, studies influencing the heterogeneity were determined. The forest plot was designed to illustrate the point prevalence's of the selected studies as well as their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In this graph, the size of each box indicated the study weight, while the CI was illustrated by the lines crossing the boxes.

ResultsIn the first phase of study search, 12,541 records were identified. Restricting the search strategy, the relatively relevant studies were reduced to 1,056. In the next steps, 323 duplicate papers and 618 irrelevant articles (during the title or abstract review) were excluded. During the quality assessment, 69 studies were removed, while four papers were added after review of references. Finally, 40 studies 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 were determined eligible to enter into the meta-analysis (Figure 1; Table 1).Selected studies for meta-analysis included a total of 200,306 primary school students, 49,559 boys and 107,321 girls. Type of studies were determined for 31 studies (16 descriptive and 15 descriptive-analytic). Among the 32 studies reporting the sampling method, 19 of which had randomization, five had consensus, and eight had multistage cluster sampling. Publication dates varied between 2000 and 2014.The total prevalence of infestation varied from 0.47% in the Doroodgar et al [30] study with a sample size of 3,589 conducted in Isfahan (center of Iran) in 2013 to 27% in the study carried out by Alempour-Salemi et al [20]among 918 students in Sistan-Baloochistan province (south-east of Iran). As illustrated in Table 1, infestation prevalences among boys differed from zero in the Salehi et al [19] study to 11.1% in the Soleimani et al [23] study. The corresponding figures for girls were 0.1% (Doroodgar study [30]) and 35.3% (Soleimani study [23]) respectively. Using Bayesian analysis method and adjustment of the effect of studies, the total prevalence modified to 0.5% (95% CI: 0.3–0.7) in the Doroodgar study [30] and 23.1% (95% CI: 20.5–25.6) in the Alempour-Salemi study.According to the results of the sensitivity analysis, the Motevalli-Haghi et al [40] study and the Motevalli-Emami et al [39] study carried out among 45,237 and 26,421 students respectively affected the amount of heterogeneity more than other studies. However, excluding these studies from the meta-analysis did not remove the heterogeneity (p < 0.0001). Because the heterogeneity did not change after exclusion of six articles, meta-analysis was carried out for all 40 studies using a random effect model to prevent more reduction of the primary studies.The forest plot (Figure 2) shows the total prevalence of head lice per study and a pooled estimate. Using a random effect model, the total prevalence of head lice among Iranian primary school children was estimated as 7.4% (95% CI: 6.6–8.2). The corresponding estimates for boys and girls were 1.6% (95% CI: 1.2–2.05) and 8.8% (95% CI: 7.6–9.9), respectively (Table 2).The effects of publication date and the climate of the study area on the pooled estimate of prevalence were investigated using met regression models. It was noted that only the effect of publication date was statistically significant, i.e., there were four unit decreases per year in the prevalence of pediculosis (Table 3).The association between hair length and pediculosis was investigated in 14 studies, eight of which reported a significant effect of long hair. Of 15 studies assessing the relationship between pediculosis and shared use of personal hygiene items, eight studies observed significant associations between use of a common comb and developing head lice infestation.Twenty-seven studies investigated the influence of the level of mother's education, all of which showed that the risk of infestation was significantly higher among children whose mothers had low levels of education. In the case of education of fathers, 21 out of 27 studies reported significant positive associations between low levels of father's education and pediculosis.The associations between the jobs of mothers and fathers were investigated in 19 studies and 23 studies, respectively. Students whose mothers were housewives (5 studies) as well as those whose fathers were worker or jobless (14 studies) were significantly at higher risk of pediculosis.Twenty-two studies assessed the relationship between prevalence and family size, 17 of which reported a higher risk of infestation in students living in bigger size families. The effect of having a bathroom in the house on pediculosis was significant in nine out of 14 studies investigating these associations. Of these, seven papers showed higher frequencies of infestation among children without access to a bathroom within their homes and also eight out of 14 studies reported higher rates of infestation among students with a lower frequency of bathing per week.

DiscussionThe main outcome of this meta-analytic study carried out among 200,306 Iranian elementary school children was that the overall head lice infestation rate was 8.8% with girls infested 5.5 fold higher than boys. We also observed that the infestation was more common among students with low educated parents, long hair, big family size, housewife mothers, worker or jobless fathers, using shared combs, lack of bathrooms, or lower frequency of bathing at home.According to Table 4, 14 studies showed the prevalence of infestation from 4.1% in the Oh et al [59] study in Korea to 40.3% in the Gazmuri et al [50] study in Chile. Infestation rates in Chile [50], Egypt [51], Turkey 1, 52, 53, 55, Thailand [56], Jordan [57], Argentina [60], Malaysia [61], and Mexico [62] were more than that in Iran. While, the prevalence of infestation was lower in Korea [59], Australia [58], and another Turkish study [54] in comparison with the prevalence in Iran.Among the above foreign studies, eight studies reported sex specific prevalence estimates. The prevalence among girls in Korea [59] was lower than that of the current study, while Chile [50], Turkey 52, 53, 54, Thailand [56], Jordan [57], and Argentina [60] reported more girls contaminated than in Iran. Iranian school boys were less affected than those in Chile [50], Jordan [57], and Argentina [60] and more than boys investigated in Turkey 52, 53, 54 and Thailand [56]. The prevalence of infestation In Iranian boy students was similar to those of Korean students [59].Comparing the results of different countries with those in Iran showed that the rate of infestation among all Iranian students, as well as among girls, is lower than those in most other countries. Conversely, Iranian boy students were more infested than those in most other countries. Moreover, the reported prevalences in other countries varied greatly. These reports showed that although the infestation rate is distributed worldwide; it is not equal among different countries and seems to be associated with cultural and socioeconomic factors 55, 56, 57, 62. A limitation in this comparison is that the reported prevalence in Iran is based on meta-analytic results while the results of the other countries are according to primary studies. These comparisons could be different if the prevalences of the other countries were estimated with meta-analytic methods.Risk of pediculosis is associated with different factors. Prevalence of infestation is more common in low socioeconomic regions, high density populations, where there is lack of personal hygiene, poor health facilities, and lack of a school health educator. This infestation also occurs when hair and clothes are not regularly washed. In addition, pediculosis is related to educational levels of parents and their attitude to health standards [63]. Our study showed that the frequency of head lice infestation among primary school children is related to different factors. In a study conducted among 2,210 Korean school students, similar to the current study, the infestation was significantly less common among students whose parents were teachers or employees and more common among those with less frequent hair washing per week. However, in contrast to the current study, the prevalence of infestation was contributed to a small family size and no association was observed between infestation and parents' education [64], while more educated Iranian parents increased the risk of pediculosis according to our meta-analysis.In Egypt [51], primary school girls, in comparison with school boys, were 25.8% more infested and family size and access to enough water supplies were associated with pediculosis infestation. These findings are in accord with the current situation in Iran. Turkish school girls were 3.1 fold more contaminated than boys [1], while this ratio was higher for Iranian students.In the other study carried out in Turkey [52], female sex, living with three or more siblings, and low educational levels of mothers and fathers, increased the risk of infestation approximately 41 folds, two folds, 73% and 45%, respectively. Such findings are in agreement with the current study.According to a third Turkish school survey, head lice infestation prevalence was more common among students with a previous personal and family history of infestation. However, frequency of bathing and hair washing, shared use of a comb, towel and bed, family size, and also the number of family members per room had no influence on pediculosis infestation prevalence. Similar to our findings, the rate of infestation among Turkish students with long hair were more than three times higher than those of students with short hair [53].Çetinkaya et al [55], in a study performed in Turkey, found no association between infestation with parents' level of education, type of house, and lack of bathroom within the house. Based on a cross sectional study in Jordan in 2012 [57], infestation was significantly related to sex (34.7% in girls vs. 19.6% in boys), living in a village (31.2% in rural area vs. 23.5% in urban area), and past history of infestation (57.4% in those with a positive history vs. 11.5% in those without). It was also associated with small family size, low income, long hair, lack of a bathroom, and low frequency of hair washing. In addition, a cross sectional study in Mexico [62] introduced factors such as low income (odds ratio = 9.9) and low frequency of hair washing (odds ratio = 8) as risk factors for head lice infestation.Comparison of the factors relating to pediculosis infestation demonstrated the common determinant factors were different among countries. Approximately all associated factors had socioeconomic, cultural, behavioral, and health backgrounds. Therefore, we can overcome this global health problem by reasonable planning. The majority of these factors are easily avoidable with minimum cost and simple actions such as keeping the hair neat and short, increase the frequency of hair washing per week, not sharing a personal comb and towel, and effective and prompt treatment of infested students. The main point in the prevention of reinfestation is establishing and maintaining appropriate health behaviors by comprehensive and continued supervision.The current study represented a comprehensive understanding of pediculosis prevalence and its determinant factors among Iranian elementary school children. Since the results of this study have been estimated based on scientific and statistical procedures and were comprehensively compared with the results of other national and international studies, they can be reasonably used for policymaking.Many investigated studies during the current systematic review and meta-analysis did not report any significance level (p value) of the associations. Therefore, we could not perform p value meta-analysis for the correlations between pediculosis and other relevant factors. Remarkable heterogeneity between primary studies was another limitation of this study. Therefore, we applied a random effect model to combine the primary results in this meta-analysis.Our study revealed that there is a high prevalence of head lice infestation among Iranian primary school children, particularly girls. We also observed that parents' educational level and profession, shared use of personal hygiene items, hair length, family size, having a bathroom within the house, and frequency of bathing per week, can be considered as determinant factors of infestation among these students.

Conflicts of interestThe authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Notes

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References
1. Karakuş M., Arıcı A., Toz So. Prevalence of head lice in two socio-economically different schools in the center of Izmir City, Turkey. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 38(1):2014;32–36.

2. Morsy T.A., el-Ela R.G., Mawla M.Y.. The prevalence of lice infesting students of primary, preparatory and secondary schools in Cairo, Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 31(1):2001 Apr;43–50.

3. Mohammed A.L.. Head lice infestation in school children and related factors in Mafraq governorate, Jordan. Int J Dermatol 51(2):2012 Feb;168–172.

4. Hazrati Tappeh K., Chavshin A.R., Mohammadzadeh Hajipirloo H.. Pediculosis capitis among primary school children and related risk factors in Urmia, the main city of West Azerbaijan, Iran. J Arthropod Borne Dis 6(1):2012 Jun;79–85.

5. Davarpanah M.A., Rasekhi Kazerouni A., Rahmati H.. The prevalence of Pediculus capitis among the middle schoolchildren in Fars Province, southern Iran. Caspian J Intern Med 4(1):2013 Dec;607–610.

6. Lapeere H., Brochez L., Verhaeghe E.. Efficacy of products to remove eggs of Pediculus humanus capitis (Phthiraptera: Pediculidae) from the human hair. J Med Entomol 51(2):2014 Mar;400–407.

7. Kamiabi F., Nakhaei F.H.. Prevalence of pediculosis capitis and determination of risk factors in primary school children in Kerman. East Mediterr Health J 11(5–6):2005 Sep–Nov;988–992.

8. Zahirneia M., Taherkhani H., Bathaei J.. Comparison assessment of three shampoo types in treatment of infestation of head lice in elementary school girl in Hamadan. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 49(9–11):2005;16–24.

9. Buczek A., Markowska-Gosik D., Widomska D.. Pediculosis capitis among schoolchildren in Urban and rural areas of eastern Poland. Eur J Epidemiol 19:2004;491–495.

10. Omidi A., Khodaveisi M., Moghimbeigi A.. Pediculosis capitis and relevant factors in secondary school students of Hamadan, West of Iran. J Res Health Sci 13(2):2013 Sep;176–180.

11. Motovali-Emami M., Aflatoonian M.R., Fekri A.. Epidemiological aspects of Pediculosis capitis and treatment evaluation in primary-school children in Iran. Pak J Biol Sci 11(2):2008 Jan;260–264.

12. Vahabi A., Shemshad K., Sayyadi M.. Prevalence and risk factors of Pediculus (humanus) capitis (Anoplura: Pediculidae), in primary schools in Sanandaj City, Kurdistan Province, Iran. Trop Biomed 29(2):2012 Jun;207–211.

13. Moosazadeh M., Nekoei-Moghadam M., Emrani Z.. Prevalence of unwanted pregnancy in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Health Plann Manage 29(3):2014 Jul–Sep;e277–e290.

14. Elm E.V., Altman D.G., Egger M.; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335(7624):2007 Oct;806–808.

15. Mohammadi-Azni S.. Prevalence of head lice at the primary schools in Damghan. Zahedan J Res Med Sci 16(11):2014 Nov;47–49.

16. Moradi A.R., Zahirnia A.H., Alipour A.M.. The prevalence of Pediculosis capitis in primary school students in Bahar, Hamadan province, Iran. J Res Health Sci 9(1):2009 Jun;45–49.

17. Motevalli Haghi F., Golchin M., Yousefi M.. Prevalence of Pediculosis and associated risk factors in the girls primary school in Azadshahr City, Golestan Province, 2012–2013. Iran J Health Sci 2(2):2014 Jun;63–68.

18. Nazari M., Saidijam M.. Pediculus capitis infestation according to sex and social factors in Hamedan-Iran. Pak J Biol Sci 10(19):2007 Oct;3473–3475.

19. Salehi Sh, Ban M., Motaghi M.. A study of head lice infestation (Pediculosis capitis) among primary school students in the villages of Abadan in 2012. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery 2(3):2014 Jul;196–200.

20. Alempour-Salemi J., Shayeghi N., Zeraati H.. Some aspects of head lice infestation in Iranshahr area (southeast of Iran). Iran J Public Health 32:2003;60–63.

21. Sayyadi M., Vahabi A., Sayyad S.. An epidemiological survey of head louse infestation among primary school children in rural areas of Ravansar County, West of Iran. Life Sci J 10(12s):2013 Jan;869–872.

22. Shayeghi M., Paksa A., Salim Abadi Y.. Epidemiology of head lice infestation in primary school pupils, in Khajeh city, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Iran J Arthropod Borne Dis 4(1):2010 Jun;42–46.

23. Soleimani M., Zare S., Hanafi-Bojd A.A.. The epidemiological aspect of Pediculusis in primary school of Qeshm, South of Iran. J Med Sci 7(2):2007;299–302.

24. Vahabi B., Vahabi A., Gharib A.. Prevalence of head louse infestations and factors affecting the rate of infestation among primary schoolchildren in Paveh City, Kermanshah Province, Iran in the years 2009 to 2010. Life Sci J 10(12s):2013 Jan;360–364.

25. Yousefi S., Shamsipoor F., Salim Abadi Y.. Epidemiological study of head louse (Pediculus humanus capitis) infestation among primary school students in rural areas of Sirjan County, South of Iran. Thrita J Med Sci 1(2):2012 Jun;53–56.

26. Afshari A., Gholami M., Hagh-Verdi T.. Study of prevalence of head lice infestation in female students in primary schools in Robat Karim County during 2008–2009 years. J Toloo-e-behdasht 12(2):2013;102–111.

27. Arjomanzadeh S., Tahmasebi R., Jokar M.. Prevalence of pediculosis and scabies in primary school in Bushehr city. J South Med 1:2001;41–46.

28. Bashiribod H., Eslami G., Fallah F.. Prevalence of head lice primary schools in Shahryar and lice-killing effects on pollution. Pajoohandeh J 6(4):2001;9–15.

29. Davari B., Yaghmaie R.. Prevalence of head lice and its related factors in the primary school students in Sanandaj 1999. Sci J Kurdistan Univ Med Sci 10(1):2005;39–45.

30. Doroodgar A., Sadr F., Sayyah M.. Prevalence and associated factors of head lice infestation among primary schoolchildren in city of Aran and Bidgol (Esfahan Province, Iran), 2008. Payesh J 10(4):2011 Oct;439–447.

31. Farzinnia B., Hanafi Bojd A., Reis Karami S.. Epidemiology of Pediculosis capitis in female primary school pupils Qom. Hormozgan Med J 8(2):2004 May–Jul;103–108.

32. Ghaderi R., Eizadpanah A., Miri M.. The prevalence of Pediculosis capitis in school students in Birjand. Modern Care J 7(1–2):2010 Jan;49–54.

33. Gholami Parizad E., Abedzadah S.. Studying headlice infestation and factors affecting it among the primary school students in lIam. JIUMS 8–9(29–30):2001;16–21.

34. Hosseini S.H., Rajabzadeh R., Shoraka V.. Prevalence of Pediculosis and its related factors among primary school students in Maneh-va Semelghan district. J North Khorasan Univ Med Sci 6(1):2014 Feb–Apr;50.

35. Javidi Z., Mashayekhi V., Maleki M.. Prevalence of Pediculosis capitis in primary school girls in Mashhad City. Med J Mashhad 47(85):2004;281–284.

36. Modarresi M., Mansoori Ghiasi M., Modarresi M.. The prevalence of head lice infestation among primary school children in Tonekabon, Iran. Iran J Infect Dis Trop Med 18(60):2013;41–45.

37. Moradi A.R., Bathaii S.J., Shojaeian M.. Outbreak of Pediculosis capitis in students of Bahar in Hamedan province. J Dermatol Cosmet 3(1):2012 Jul;26–32.

38. Motalebi M., Minoueian Haghighi M.H.. The survey of Pediculosis prevalence on Gonabad primary school students. Ofogh-e-Danesh 6(1):2000;80–87.

39. Motavalli-Emami M., Shams M., Sadri G.. A survey to determine the prevalence of Pediculosis in students of Khomeini-Shahr district in the school year of 2000–2001. J Isfahan Univ Med Sci 8(4):2003;102–107.

40. Motevalli-Haghi S.F., Rafinejad J., Hosseni M.. Prevalence of Pediculosis and associated risk factors in primary-school children of Mazandaran Province, Iran, 2012–2013. J Mazand Univ Med Sci 23(110):2014;82–91.

41. Noroozi M., Saghafipour A., Akbari A.. The prevalence of Pediculosis capitis and its associated risk factors in primary schools of girls in rural district. J Shahrekord Uuniv Med Sci 15(2):2013 May;43–52.

42. Poorbaba R., Moshkbid-Haghighi M., Habibipoor R.. Prevalence of Pediculosis capitis in primary school children at Guilan province in 2002–2003. J Guilan Univ Med Sci 13:2004;15–23.

43. Rafie A., Kasiri H., Mohammadi Z.. Pediculosis capitis and its associated factors in girl primary school children in Ahvaz City in 2005–2006. Iran J Infect Dis Trop Med 45:2009;41–45.

44. Rafinejad J., Noorollahi A., Javadian A.. Epidemiology of Pediculosis capitis and its related factors in primary school children in Amlash, Gilan province in 2003–2004. Iranian Epidemiol J 2(3–4):2006;51–63.

45. Saghafipour A., Akbari A., Norouzi M.. The epidemiology of Pediculus humanus capitis infestation and effective factors in elementary schools of Qom province girls 2010 Qom, Iran. J Qom Univ Med Sci 6(3):2012;46–51.

46. Shahraki G.H., Azizi K., Yousefi A.. Head louse infestation rate of primary school students in Yasuj city. J Yasuj Univ Med Sci 6(21–22):2001;22–23.

47. Soleimanizadeh L., Sharifi K.. Study of effective factors on prevalence of head lice in primary school students of Bandar Abbas (1999). Iran J Infect Dis Trop Med 7(19):2002;79–85.

48. Yaghmaie R., Rad F., Ghaderi A.. Prevalence of head lice infestation in girl primary school children in Sanandaj in 2004. Iran J Infect Dis Trop Med 12:2006;71–74.

49. Zabihi A., Jafarian Amiri S.R., Rezvani S.M.. A study on prevalence of Pediculosis in the primary school students of Babol, 2003–2004. JBUMS 7(4):2005;88–93.

50. Gazmuri B.P., Arriaza T.B., Castro S.F.. Epidemiological study of Pediculosis in elementary schools of Arica, northern Chile. Rev Chil Pediatr 85(3):2014 Jun;312–318.

51. Abd El Raheem T.A., El Sherbiny N.A., Elgameel A.. Epidemiological comparative study of pediculosis capitis among primary school children in Fayoum and Minofiya governorates, Egypt. J Community Health 40(2):2015 Aug;222–226.

52. Gulgun M., Balci E., Karaoğlu A.. Pediculosis capitis: prevalence and its associated factors in primary school children living in rural and urban areas in Kayseri, Turkey. Cent Eur J Public Health 21(2):2013 Jun;104–108.

53. Değerli S., Malatyalı E., Mumcuoğlu K.Y.. Head lice prevalence and associated factors in two boarding schools in Sivas. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 37(1):2013;32–35.

54. Değerli S., Malatyali E., Çeliksöz A.. The prevalence of Pediculus humanus capitis and the coexistence of intestinal parasites in young children in boarding schools in Sivas, Turkey. Pediatr Dermatol 29(4):2012 Jul–Aug;426–429.

55. Çetinkaya Ü., Hamamcı B., Delice S.. The prevalence of Pediculus humanus capitis in two primary schools of Hacılar, Kayseri. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 35(3):2011;151–153.

56. Rassami W., Soonwera M.. Epidemiology of Pediculosis capitis among schoolchildren in the eastern area of Bangkok, Thailand. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2(11):2012 Nov;901–904.

57. AlBashtawy M., Hasna F.. Pediculosis capitis among primary-school children in Mafraq Governorate, Jordan. East Mediterr Health J 18(1):2012 Jan;43–48.

58. Currie M.J., Reynolds G.J., Glasgow N.J.. A pilot study of the use of oral ivermectin to treat head lice in primary school students in Australia. Pediatr Dermatol 27(6):2010 Nov–Dec;595–599.

59. Oh J.M., Lee I.Y., Lee W.J.. Prevalence of Pediculosis capitis among Korean children. Parasitol Res 107(6):2010 Nov;1415–1419.

60. Toloza A., Vassena C., Gallardo A.. Epidemiology of Pediculosis capitis in elementary schools of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Parasitol Res 104(6):2009 Jun;1295–1298.

61. Bachok N., Nordin R.B., Awang C.W.. Prevalence and associated factors of head lice infestation among primary schoolchildren in Kelantan, Malaysia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 37(3):2006 May;536–543.

62. Manrique-Saide P., Pavía-Ruz N., Rodríguez-Buenfil J.C.. Prevalence of Pediculosis capitis in children from rural school in Yucatan, Mexico. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 53(6):2011 Nov–Dec;325–327.

63. Silva L., Aguiar Alencar R., Goulart Madeira N.. Survey assessment of parental perceptions regarding head lice. Int J Dermatol 47(3):2008 Mar;249–255.

64. Sim S., Lee W.J., Yu J.R.. Risk factors associated with head louse infestation in Korea. Korean J Parasitol 49(1):2011 Mar;95–98.

Figure 1
Literature search and review flowchart for selection of primary studies.
gr1
Figure 2
The prevalence of head lice in primary school students by included studies in the current meta-analysis and overall estimate. CI = confidence interval; ES = estimate; ID = identification.
gr2
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of included studies in the meta-analysis of prevalence of head lice in primary school students in Iran.
ID First author Publication y Language of publication Place of study Sample size (N)
Prevalence (%)
Association between prevalence of head lice with variables of: (P-value)
Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Hair sizea Sharing personal items Education of mother Education of father Job of mother Job of father Family size Bathing facilities in the house Bathing frequency
1 Hazrati Tappeh [4] 2012 EN West Azarbaijan 2,040 866 1,174 4 1.8 5.5 <0.05 NS NS NS NS NS
2 Kamiabi [7] 2005 EN Kerman 1,200 564 636 3.8 0.4 6.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
3 Mohammadi-Azni [15] 2014 EN Semnan 2,700 2,700 3.6 3.6
4 Moradi [16] 2009 EN Hamadan 900 450 450 1.3 0.44 2.2 <0.05 <0.05 NS
5 Motevalli Haghi [17] 2014 EN Golestan 1,510 1,510 3.6 3.6 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
6 Nazari [18] 2007 EN Hamadan 847 440 407 6.85 0.7 13.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS <0.05
7 Salehi [19] 2014 EN Khoozestan 624 302 322 4.3 0 8.4 NS NS NS
8 Alempour-Salemi [20] 2003 EN Sistan and Baluchestan 918 918 27 27 NS
9 Sayyadi [21] 2013 EN Kermanshah 358 358 15.8 15.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS NS NS <0.05 <0.05
10 Shayeghi [22] 2010 EN East Azerbaijan 500 200 300 4.8 2 6.7 NS <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
11 Soleimani [23] 2007 EN Hormozgan 515 246 269 23.9 11.1 35.3 <0.05 <0.05 NS <0.05 <0.05
12 Vahabi [12] 2012 EN Kurdistan 810 810 4.7 4.7 NS <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS NS NS
13 Vahabi [24] 2013 EN Kermanshah 750 750 8 8 NS <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS <0.05 NS
14 Yousefi [25] 2012 EN Kerman 1,772 926 846 1.1 0.6 1.6 NS <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
15 Motovali-Emami [11] 2008 EN Kerman 40,586 19,774 20,812 1.8 0.6 2.9 <0.05
16 Afshari [26] 2013 Persian Tehran 10,000 10,000 1.25 1.25 NS NS
17 Arjomanzadeh [27] 2001 Persian Booshehr 3,913 1,962 1,951 12 2 22 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
18 Bashiribod [28] 2001 Persian Tehran 1,921 15.8 <0.05
19 Davari [29] 2005 Persian Kurdistan 1,195 19.7 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
20 Doroodgar [30] 2010 Persian Esfahan 3,589 2,096 1,493 0.47 1 0.1 <0.05 NS <0.05 <0.05 NS <0.05
21 Farzinnia [31] 2004 Persian Qom 1,650 1,650 4.5 4.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS NS NS <0.05 NS
22 Ghaderi [32] 2010 Persian South Khorasan 1,226 4.5
23 Gholami parizad [33] 2001 Persian Ilam 658 315 343 5.5 4.5 6.5 <0.05 <0.05 NS <0.05 <0.05
24 Hosseini [34] 2014 Persian North Khorasan 250 120 130 10 4.2 15.4 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
25 Javidi [35] 2004 Persian Razavi Khorasan 769 769 7.6 7.6
26 Modarresi [36] 2013 Persian Mazandaran 1,846 889 957 5.7 2.5 8.8 NS <0.05 <0.05 NS NS
27 Moradi [37] 2012 Persian Hamadan 8,568 8.2
28 Motalebi [38] 2000 Persian Gonabad 846 10.3 <0.05 <0.05
29 Motevalli-Emami [39] 2003 Persian Esfahan 26,421 0.8
30 Motevalli-Haghi [40] 2014 Persian Mazandaran 45,237 9,213 36,024 1.8 1.7 1.9 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
31 Noroozi [41] 2013 Persian Gom 900 900 13.3 13.3 NS <0.05 <0.05 NS <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
32 Poorbaba [42] 2004 Persian Guilan 2,893 1,493 1,400 4.5 3.3 5.7 <0.05 <0.05 NS <0.05
33 Rafie [43] 2009 Persian Khoozestan 810 810 11 11 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
34 Rafinejad [44] 2006 Persian Guilan 4,244 2,115 2,129 9.2 4.7 13.7 <0.05 NS <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS NS
35 Saghafipour [45] 2012 Persian Gom 1,725 1,725 7.6 7.6 NS <0.05 <0.05 NS <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
36 Shahraki [46] 2001 Persian Kohgiluyeh and Boyer–Ahmad 12,247 6,438 5,809 11 1.3 21.8
37 Soleimanizadeh [47] 2002 Persian Bandarabbas 3,249 12.3 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS
38 Yaghmaie [48] 2007 Persian Kurdistan 600 600 7.7 7.7 NS <0.05 NS NS NS
39 Zabihi [49] 2005 Persian Mazandaran 2,300 1,150 1,150 2.2 0.96 3.5 NS <0.05 NS NS <0.05
40 Zahirnia [8] 2005 Persian Hamadan 7,219 7,219 13.5 13.5
EN = English; NS = not significant.
a Short, Moderate, High.
Table 2
Pooled estimated of head lice prevalence in primary school students in Iran, according to the result of the meta-analysis.
Prevalence by Sample size Pooled estimate (%), 95% CI Heterogeneity test
Heterogeneity (I2 %)
Chi-square(Q) p
Boys 49,559 1.6 (1.2–2.05) 244.9 <0.001 92.6
Girls 107,321 8.8 (7.6–9.9) 4,636.5 <0.001 99.3
Total 200,306 7.4 (6.6–8.2) 5,633.7 <0.001 99.3
CI = confidence limit.
Table 3
Related factors with heterogeneity of head lice prevalence in the current meta-analysis.
Variables Univariate meta regression
Multivariate meta regression
Coefficient p Coefficient p
Publication yr −0.4 0.041 −0.4 0.046
The climate of the study area −0.5 0.647 −0.3 0.719
Table 4
Prevalence of head lice in primary school in other countries.
First author Country Publication y Sample size Prevalence (%)
Boys Girls Total
Gazmuri [50] Chile 2014 467 23 55.2 40.3
Abd El Raheem [51] Egypt 2015 10,935 16.7
Karakuş [1] Turkey 2014 214 13.5
Gulgun [52] Turkey 2013 8,122 0.9 25.2 13.1
Değerli [53] Turkey 2013 342 1.1 13.7 10.2
Değerli [54] Turkey 2012 772 0.2 12.9 6
Çetinkaya [55] Turkey 2011 405 10.9
Rassami [56] Thailand 2012 3,747 0 47.1 23.3
AlBashtawy [57] Jordan 2012 1,550 19.6 34.7 26.6
Currie [58] Australia 2010 702 5.3
Oh [59] Korea 2010 15,373 1.9 6.5 4.1
Toloza [60] Argentina 2009 1,856 26.7 36.1 29.7
Bachok [61] Malaysia 2006 463 35
Manrique-Saide [62] Mexico 2011 140 13.6